Manifesto Multilinko
Interesting links and notes on updates to my main website.

[add RSS feed][add RSS feed]
[Add to My Yahoo] [subscribe on Bloglines]

[to search, use Blogger search in top bar]




This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

[contact me]

My Blogger Profile

View my photo galleries.

Listen to my radio station.

    follow me on Twitter

    Linkblog


    OLD Blinklist Linkblog

    OLD BlogMarks Linkblog

    Currently Reading



    This is an Ottawa blog (Ontario, Canada).

    Cool blogs:
    McWetlog
    wood s lot
    La Tribu du Verbe
    Wil Wheaton
    Darren Barefoot
    Lectio.ca


    Blogger profiles in Ottawa

    Hot links:
    delicious - popular - new

    Other good sites:
    Slashdot
    Wired News
    Mark Morford's Notes & Errata


    This page uses Extreme Tracker which is determining your referrer by running some JavaScript.
    eXTReMe Tracker


    The commenting system is Reblogger.

    BlogCanada webring

    This blog is listed on BlogShares.

    Saturday, March 22, 2003


    Went with friends to Savana Cafe last night and then to The Quiet American. TQA certainly doesn't take a positive view of the American involvement in Vietnam.

    Friday, March 21, 2003
    US - nukleer weapons

    From Ask the Globe:

    What is the Bush administration's position on reducing the United States's nuclear arsenal?

    Nearly a year ago, the United States and Russia signed a treaty requiring both countries to cut their strategic nuclear arsenals to between 1,700 and 2,200 deployed warheads by 2012.

    At present, the United States has 10,729 intact nuclear warheads with spare parts available for thousands more, according to the Washington-based Center for Defense Information.

    The U.S. Senate approved the treaty earlier this month; Russian legislators this week postponed a ratification vote. The United States has a huge tactical-nuclear-weapons arsenal not covered by the treaty.

    The Centre for Defense Information says that notwithstanding the treaty, the United States is modernizing its nuclear arsenal on several fronts. For example, the United States has upgraded its Minuteman ICBMs and the Trident II missiles.

    Is it just me or is TEN THOUSAND a bit much, considering that other than Russia, the entire rest of the world has what, like 500?
    Canada has zero.

    This actually leads to a bit of thinking which turns the whole US position on Iraq inside-out.
    Ok, you're a terrorist. A mean nasty no-holds-barred terrorist.
    Are you going to
    A) Try to surmount substantial barriers to smuggle WMD into the US or
    B) Just use the vast array of WMD already within the United States

    Seems to me, if the US is worried about terrorists using WMD on The Homeland, they should be frantically destroying the thousands of weapons they already have scattered across the entire country.

    Iraq - checking the evidence

    This is also good, via Tread lightly: Myths and misconceptions about Iraq.

    President Bush - tick tick tick

    What Makes W. Tick? Interview related to April 2003 story on G.W.Bush in The Atlantic. Via Tread lightly.




    Microsoft WMD

    Oh My God. Microsoft has WMD.

    corporations

    I don't see any way to link to the posting directly, but anyway, from shiny blue grasshopper:
    Kuchinich on Corporations.

    I have actually been thinking about this and if I were to go back and help Trudeau with the Constitution, I would put in an explicit clause on corporations.
    Something like "corporations are not persons, and have none of the rights that attach thereto". Or you can see better language and more discussion in my earlier posting.

    The US needs a constitutional amendment about corporations.

    Asterix

    Interesting McWetloggage on Asterix.

    war - Wil says no

    A nice concise anti-war statement by Wil Wheaton.



    I don't like to pick on the Southern US, it's just that it's very easy for me to draw a straight line from the beliefs required to support slavery and the beliefs the world fears.

    Probably, if you're within this system, it's hard to see what it looks like from outside.
    But in the rest of the western world, when we talk about scary religious extremists, we're as likely to be talking about American fundamentalist "christianity" as we are to be talking about radical "islam". I put both of these in quotes, as they have almost no relation to the book-based beliefs.

    The belief needed for slavery is that one group is superior to an entire other group, and in fact entitled to run their lives.

    And then you get a very nice hierarchy: God - rich white men - poor white men - white women - blacks.
    This is odd in a modern US which is a leader in flattening class and gender divides.
    But that has been actually accomplished in two ways. One is radical individualism (the individual as god). The other is radical anti-elitism, anti-aspirationalism.
    The world looks at the US and they see legions of men and women, fat and rich, wearing giant sweatpants and sweatshirts.
    Rosanne-world. Because everything is about immediate personal comfort and satisfaction.

    And we see this whole package of irrational, pseudo-religious, extremist beliefs.

    Pro-
    gun, war, military spending, violence, patriotism, jingoism, death penalty, abstinence, creationism, legal drug, SUV, cheap oil, consumption, large quantities bland food

    Anti-
    abortion, sex education, illegal drug, environment, tax, intellectual

    and yet even more dementedly, at a cultural level
    - vast amounts of pornography
    - super-sexualization of teens particularly the females
    - incredible levels of gun violence, particularly retributory violence

    on the one hand, this country that talks endless about freedom and democracy
    but on the other a country whose own internal democracy is weak, whose internal freedoms are perpetually being reduced,
    and which interferes in other countries worldwide, often resulting in those countries losing ALL of their democracy and freedom

    These views are dramatically different from the rest of the West.
    The fear is that already for decades Americans have been exporting their (to us) bizarre, contradictory, illogical, and possibly destructive belief system through their entertainment and wealth.
    We are now afraid they will start using their incredible military power to do the same.

    I guess the main point is, from inside it's probably difficult to see the contradictions
    and how different the "mainstream" views are from the mainstream in the rest of the western world.
    From the outside it... ok... um... to be blunt, it looks to us like the Americans are insane.

    anti-abortion plus anti-sexedu?
    anti-abortion plus pro-deathpenalty?
    christian yet pro-gun and pro-war?
    christian yet pro-consumption and pro-wealth?
    pro-legaldrug yet anti-illegaldrug?

    These are trivially contradictory beliefs.
    Holding diametrically opposed beliefs is, erm,
    well it's quite mad you see.

    They are also beliefs which are unsupported BOTH by the Bible and by science.
    You see, I don't mind if you believe in the Bible. As long as you believe in the actual beliefs made clear in the actual Bible.
    Which, I might add, can align quite well with an understanding of science.
    As is already accepted by every major religion in the whole entire freaking world.

    The closest equivalent to the set of beliefs in America is really a cult.
    The Cult of America.

    Thursday, March 20, 2003
    international - Bush to visit Canada May 5, 2003

    Given the current events, it should be quite the visit if Bush comes to Ottawa on May 5, 2003 as previously announced.

    President Bush will pay a state visit to Canada on May 5 for talks with Prime Minister Jean Chretien focusing on border security, the Middle East and a number of trade disputes, the Canadian government announced [in February].

    It will be Bush's first official visit to Canada.

    The one-day visit will also be the first meeting between the two men since an aide to Chretien resigned in late November after privately referring to Bush as "a moron." The leaders last met in Detroit in September 2002.

    Chretien spokesman Jim Munson told reporters that Bush was due to make a formal address to the Canadian parliament.

    Considering that Liberal members of Parliament have been competing to outdo one another in anti-Bush comments, that should be quite a show.

    So there will be massive security to protect the Prez.
    Plus one would expect massive anti-war demonstrations.
    Yeah, that should be a great combination.



    How Canada can save the world:

    - demonstrate model of economic and social success
    - get the Northern US to ditch Dixie and join us


    war - churches deplore

    A church near my apartment is tolling its bell continuously. I don't know if it's to protest the war or what, but it certainly adds an air of gloom to an already dark and stormy night.

    Churches deplore war in Iraq

    In Reading Iraq, it says

    In the mass of pulp novels dealing with the Middle East, there is one title that stands alone in shaping U.S. attitudes toward the region. Tim LeHaye's Left Behind Tribulation novels, eight of which have been published, have sold a mind-boggling 50 million copies.

    The books portray the "end time" as described in the Bible's Book of Revelation and interpreted by U.S. fundamentalists. With images of people on an airplane being "raptured" into heaven and leaving their shoes behind, the series is scorned by the media. But, writes critic Edmund Cohen, they are "consumed by grownups who receive them as deadly serious instruction about soon-to-come cataclysmic events."

    Iraq figures prominently in the Left Behind series. Satan returns to Earth at the time of the Apocalypse and rises up in the city of Baghdad, where he establishes a world totalitarian government.

    ...

    Left Behind is shot through with what Thompson calls "never explicit anti-Semitism." And Muslims are simply satanic.

    One poll found that 46 per cent of Americans, including George W. Bush, now identify themselves as born-again Christians. Although Thompson does not believe Bush would accept the extreme views of the Left Behind novels, he feels they help "normalize" a dialogue of evil doers and avenging righteous Americans.

    "There's something deep in the American heart that's very ready to respond to a series of books like that. And when the rhetoric of those books starts coming from a [White House] press conference, it seems familiar to them."

    Hmm, must be a typo. Must mean to say 46% of Americans consider themselves bomb-again Christians.

    If you're in the States and you want to know what it looks like from the outside, it's something like this:
    Steve Allen called it Dumbth. Carl Sagan worried about the return of The Demon-Haunted World.
    Quite simply, these both describe an America where rationality has been lost, and replaced with some combination of fantasy, delusion, and distorted religion. Where the fundamental critical thinking required to sustain a healthy democracy has been replaced with lazy habits of thought. An incurious public ill-prepared to make good choices about matters of any complexity whatsoever.

    It appears this has come to pass.

    war - Clear Channel

    Clear Channel, remember them, the vast organization that controls the bland pap erm I mean pop music on radio stations across the US, well apparently that wasn't enough.
    Now they are staging pro-war demonstrations.

    Another media story:

    Who's the bad guy? The one with the accent

    war - just like in the previews

    I had assumed that the 48 hours was from midnight Monday to midnight Wednesday.
    My friend said, don't be silly. It's from Bush's primetime announcement on Monday, to primetime on Wednesday.
    There was also the additional data point that, just as the entire content of Bush's Monday speech had been pre-announced,
    it had also been pre-announced that he would make a second speech, a war speech to the American public, and that as he was speaking, bombs would be dropping.

    In yesterday's Prepare for a whole new level of reality TV, Andrew Ryan wrote:

    Bush was scary in that 15-minute TV ultimatum, with cold, monotonal delivery and stony glint. He had the crazy eyes. It was a sobering cowboy dictum from a Texas president: Take yer boys and clear out. Or we're coming in. You could almost hear John Wayne whooping it up from beyond the grave.

    It's entirely unlikely something is going to happen at 8:16 p.m. -- even Americans can't be that obvious

    He was both right, and wrong. Apparently, they waited a whole 90 minutes, and then the entire event unrolled just as foretold by the television prophets.

    Google News top story Bush Announces Start Of War As Baghdad's Sky Lights Up says

    About 90 minutes after the expiration of Bush's 48-hour ultimatum for Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and his sons to leave Iraq or face war, the U.S. military struck a site near Baghdad with cruise missiles and precision-guided bombs. Fire from Iraqi antiaircraft batteries lit up the sky.

    Minutes later, Bush made this announcement in a televised address to the American people from the White House: "My fellow citizens, at this hour American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger."

    Bush, who warned the campaign could be longer and more difficult than many predict, continued: "On my orders, coalition forces have begun striking selected targets of military importance to undermine Saddam Hussein's ability to wage war. These are opening stages of what will be a broad and concerted campaign."

    U.S. officials said the location was believed to be a "target of opportunity" where "elements of the Iraqi leadership" were meeting, including possibly Saddam himself. Saddam survived the attack and spoke on Iraqi television several hours later.

    This is awaiting publishing until the Dal systems where I host my blog are back up.

    Wednesday, March 19, 2003


    My friends say BBC's Hard Talk is a good interview programme.


    war - Spanish-American, 1898

    existential linkage to Hearst's Spanish-American War of 1898.

    email - spam report

    According to CDT Releases New Report on Origins of Spam, the spam "arms race" is actually minimal.
    They say The vast majority of spam -- over 97% of it -- was delivered to addresses that had been posted on the public web.

    They say even the most simple of obfuscation techniques, such as myname at example.com or using HTML entities, can prevent the brainless harvesters from getting your address.

    So you can just do e.g. myname@example.com (where the @ is replaced by the equivalent HTML entity)
    or you can just use a generator to produce obfuscated addresses. Of course, then you have to trust the generator not to harvest the address you input...

    I'm changing my template now.

    My experience more or less matches this.
    I get a ton to bigfoot, and to chebucto.
    I got only like 2 to a test address I used on USENET, and not even very much to my website address, which has META tags to exclude it from legitimate search engines.

    I wouldn't be surprised if 90% of the spammers get their addresses directly from Google.




    Today's search hit

    19 Mar, Wed, 10:29:16 Altavista: what is the us congress

    according to Altavista, it is made up mainly of Aspartame.
    This is either an example of why people use Google, or a deep and profound insight.

    I am giddy with the responsibility of providing an authoritative definition.
    The US Congress is a bicameral house.
    (I encourage you to speak to the man on the street saying, "what do you think of bicameralism in the US Congress?")
    It consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
    They are... um... that is they are supposed to... erm...
    Ok imagine a bunch of fat rich white men past the "retirement" age of 65,
    except instead of retiring, they run the entire country.
    Well, except there are the lobbyists.
    Perhaps more accurately the Congress is tricameral: the House, the Senate, and the Lobbyists.
    The lobbyists are also rich white men, the main difference being that they are very concerned that legislation might accidentally get passed that interferes with their accumulation of wealth. Oh wait, that's not actually all that different from the other two branches of congress.

    Ok ok I could go on like this for quite a while but you may want to just go right on down to www.congress.gov and learn all about the exciting process yourself.

    Ontario - alert levels

    Hey, apparently we have alert levels too. It's just that erm, well I for one have never heard of them before. Or the entire ministry that's in charge of them.




    Does anyone know if you can get advance tickets for The Matrix Reloaded?
    I looked around the various sites but I didn't see anything.
    Maybe Famous Players will have a Buy Tickets for it closer to the release date?

    war, international, USA - Jeffrey Simpson on Project for the New American Century

    Jeffrey Simpson has been writing a fair amount lately about the Psychos for a New American Century. His latest is The difference between them and us.



    I'm not the greatest fan of the Pope but nevertheless when he says

    "I lived through World War II ... For this reason, I have the duty to say 'Never again war'."

    That's certainly worth a listen. Link via tread lightly. I wasn't able to find that exact quote on the rather confusing Vatican site, maybe you can.

    On a related note, check The Chickenhawk Database.
    It seems enthusiasm for war is greatest in those who have avoided personal participation in military action.



    via Treading Lightly (but I have changed to link directly to MM's site): A Letter from Michael Moore to George W. Bush on the Eve of War.

    If BfC wins the Oscar for Best Documentary on Sunday, MM's acceptance speech should be sweet.




    Thanks to AvantGo, I read all of Scud Stud lobs a missile at Bush on my Clie without ads.
    However, it's worth tolerating the commercial online to read the whole thing.



    I have seen the black helicopters of the unwanted World Government, and guess what, they come not from the United Nations but from

    The Arrogant Empire

    This is particularly telling

    By contrast, the United States will spend as much next year on defense as the rest of the world put together (yes, all 191 countries).

    On a related note, I was flicking the channels and although I only watched briefly, the gist was CNBC's Lawrence Kudlow doing a segment on "Shortchanging the Military" where he was arguing that (paraphrase) "since we are in a world war" the US needs to spend more on its military, in order to be able to (paraphrase) "deploy in the Pacific, the Atlantic, South America, the Middle East..."

    Tuesday, March 18, 2003


    Lots of good stuff at wood s lot as usual, including

    www.iraqbodycount.net

    As well, given my previous rantage, enjoy the confluence of Smart, Iraq War, and Nazism:
    We've Become Such Good Little Germans. If We Care About Elizabeth Smart, Why Not the Children of Iraq?

    Personally, I have mostly avoided the Get Smart story. I hate all these media frenzythons.
    Media frenzyth0ngs, now that would be different.
    Um.
    Also I try to avoid any Nazi, Hitler etc. comparisons. I find they just come too easy. It's a lazy rhetorical device.



    Today's search hit is simply:

    MSN Search: nudity -- More Useful Everyday

    If you click through, you will discover the interesting new feature:

    eBay.ca
    Buy and Sell
    "nudity"
    From $1

    Also it's on page: Results 421-435 of about 580091 containing "nudity".
    Um, you know that commercial about surfing ALL of the Internet?
    You don't actually have to try to do that.
    "Hmm, those first 400 results were interesting, I think I'll check out the remaining 570,500."

    war - gettin it on

    Oh, and the excitement of the upcoming war has the US once again
    [high]

    Plus an exciting new Operation: the other other Operation.
    Erm, I mean Operation Liberty Shield.

    You know, code names were a lot cooler when they were like, code names.

    international - Canada and the US

    As usual, good linkage from GT: The Economist on Canada and the United States.

    environment - watery golf

    And since
    1. the war is about to start and
    2. Canada isn't participating

    I think that's about enough warblog.

    In other news, thanks to the madness of Golf in the desert, the United States is the most wasteful water user in the world.

    war - the March 17th speech

    And as I'm sure you know, in the latest of the President's oddly flat speeches: President Says Saddam Hussein Must Leave Iraq Within 48 Hours.

    You know, the previous one, the press con, the way he was speaking reminded me of that drugged leader guy from that Star Trek episode.

    [Kirk and Spock] discover that [the leader,] Gill is only the drugged puppet of deputy Führer Melakon after he gives a stilted speech unleashing the final assault on Zeon.

    war - Canada will not go without the UN

    I didn't even know there was a news.gc.ca

    Anyway, buried a bit on the PM's site: Prime Minister Jean Chrétien's response to a question on Iraq, March 17, 2003

    I want to set out the position of the Government of Canada. We believe that Iraq must fully abide by the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council. We have always made clear that Canada would require the approval of the Security Council if we were to participate in a military campaign.

    Over the last few weeks the Security Council has been unable to agree on a new resolution authorizing military action.

    Canada worked very hard to find a compromise to bridge the gap in the Security Council. Unfortunately we were not successful.

    If military action proceeds without a new resolution of the Security Council, Canada will not participate.

    Monday, March 17, 2003


    Everything you need to know about Truro, Nova Scotia:

    In our home in Truro, N.S., the front parlour took up a third of the downstairs and was empty unless we had visitors (except at Christmas -- when we hung socks over the fireplace). The front door was similarly for the quality, whereas the back door was for tradesmen and children.

    As the "head of the house," my father sat at the head of the table and was served first. We did not play cards on Sunday and Saturday dances had to end by a quarter to 12. At church, we listened to entire sermons on the evils of Sunday sports. Our bookcases were packed with Dickens and Kipling and Scott and Tennyson. Crossing the Bar was a staple at funerals, at which we were expected to wear black.

    At school, girls and boys used separate doors as though it were a lavatory; taverns, likewise, had an entrance for Men and another for Ladies and Escorts. Students were encouraged to join a temperance society called Allied Youth, as well as the Boy Scouts and the Girl Guides.

    from Unlocking the Victorian within in today's Globe.

    war - 'moment of truth'

    Blogger apparently took a holiday, perhaps paralyzed by last-minute warblogging.

    Today's best search hit is ikea bomb shelter price

    Our Master Bush has issued his proclamation.
    I particularly like this bit:

    Let me say something about the U.N. It's a very important organization. That's why I went there on September the 12th, 2002, to give the speech, the speech that called the U.N. into account, that said if you're going to pass resolutions, let's make sure your words mean something. Because I understand the wars of the 21st century are going to require incredible international cooperation. We're going to have to cooperate to cut the money of the terrorists, and the ability for nations, dictators who have weapons of mass destruction to provide training and perhaps weapons to terrorist organizations. We need to cooperate, and we are. Our countries up here are cooperating incredibly well.

    And the U.N. must mean something. Remember Rwanda, or Kosovo. The U.N. didn't do its job. And we hope tomorrow the U.N. will do its job. If not, all of us need to step back and try to figure out how to make the U.N. work better as we head into the 21st century. Perhaps one way will be, if we use military force, in the post-Saddam Iraq the U.N. will definitely need to have a role. And that way it can begin to get its legs, legs of responsibility back.

    Note to Bush: United Nations does not mean the same as Nations United behind the United States. Maybe if the crazy US right-wing lunatics with their black helicopter delusions hadn't spent the last decades underfunding and undermining the UN, it would have been able to deal with Rwanda despite the (see below) US opposition to actually doing anything.

    Moment of truth?
    Fvck. Well I guess it would be nice to have ONE moment of truth in a war that has been justified by lies, fabrications and misdirection from the beginning.

    Globe front page reportage: Today is 'moment of truth'

    Plus which, as I mentioned before, isn't it for the democratically elected (erm, ok, somehow elected) US Congress to declare war, as laid out in that obscure and now rarely-consulted document, the Constitution and its related articles.

    Sunday, March 16, 2003
    war - Rwanda misdirection

    I particularly like when Bush goes on and on and on about how Saddam is Evil.
    Well of-fvcking-course he's evil. Whoop-de-doo.
    Crazed leaders all over the world are evil.
    Many of them got there thanks to help from their enlightened US masters.

    Of course, if Bush knew the teeniest, tinest shred of history he would know that this was the case.
    In which case, as Chretien pointed out, he would have to follow his Saddam logic and run around the world unseating evil leaders.
    But of course Bush has no freaking clue about anything.
    As far as he knows, Saddam is probably the only bad person in the entire world.

    I love it when he stands up there.
    "Don't you understand", he seems to say, "Saddam BAD. America GOOD. Bible say, GOOD defeat BAD. Must have war."

    How dare Bush invoke Rwanda to justify his war

    war - let us pray

    If yours is the kind of god who listens to prayers, I suppose we should at least give thanks that the cabal currently in power in the US didn't hold sway during the Cold War, because we'd all be living in some post-Apocalyptic radioactive world if they had.

    While you're at it Let us pray George Bush sees the light

    For those of you just joining us: following an election of dubious legitimacy, a small group of madmen has seized power in the US. Their vision for US society appears to be a theocratic, capitalist, police state. Patriotism in this vision consists in equal measures of ceaseless consumption and unquestioning obedience. The economy is a tool designed to ensure that wealth continues to flow up to the wealthy, and all other economic considerations are irrelevant.

    Their vision for the world is of the Triumphalist US sitting astride the globe like a colossus, using its unstoppable military might to ensure that the US consumer can keep on consuming, and that the rich continue to get richer, as is their God-given destiny.

    If their actions cause a planetary apocalpyse well, wasn't that what the Bible plan was anyway? Plus which, the pure rich shining white folk are all going to ascend into heaven in the coming-soon Rapture anyway.

    The future of America: bland rich Mormons in their giant houses busily consuming. And if the price is the occasional homeless madman who has somehow, inexplicably, become crazed by an irrational religion well, you know, enough prayers from Important People will sort that out happily and we'll all have Learned a Lesson About Life now, won't we.

    This is the 21st freaking century, and people's greatest aspirations are to sit in a huge house watching shows about angels on a giant TV while elsewhere in the world, lucky children quickly get to see angels for real because they are starving to death? To sit in comfy chairs listening to sweet harp music played by the army of children they have produced, while in the rest of the world, children are drafted into armies, that is, if they're not too busy being enslaved.

    Jesus Christ.

    war - who's your baddie?

    More good linkage via Tread lightly

    Iraq, the U.S., and threatening world peace. Follow the link through to the table. To which I would add.

    Ok let's see.

    1. "He [Saddam] kills his own people!"
    Oh, and the American Civil War?
    The various wars and massacres against the Indians?
    This is not ancient history. The Civil War was 1860s. The Massacre at Wounded Knee was 1890.
    Plus which, hello, slavery.
    2. "He [Saddam] uses biological weapons! On his own people!"
    Oh, and smallpox blankets for the Indians?
    Various medical experiments on the powerless?
    3. "We [the US] have always defended democracy, unlike you other slack countries."
    Um yeah, like when you were late for BOTH World Wars?
    Like when you destablized countries all over the world because their democratic choices weren't the ones you liked?
    Like when you had the LAST Gulf War to protect Kingdoms such as Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, where rights are at the whim of the royalty?
    4. "We [the US] are a beacon of democracy"
    Yeah, what with that amazing TWO PARTY system and all.
    And some tiny fraction of your population turning out for the elections.
    Which barely work because you use ridiculous voting machines unlike the paper-and-pencil systems used by democratic countries all over the rest of the freaking world.
    5. "We [the US] are a beacon of freedom"
    Yeah, what with having NO PRIVACY COMMISSIONER.
    Or strong legislation protecting privacy rights.
    What with rights having been consistently, relentlessly eroded since the 1960s, when it appeared to the surprise and dismay of rich white male Americans that they might actually apply equally to everyone.

    and so on

    war - the whale of Babylon

    Tread lightly on the things of earth added to sidebar.
    (Although surely, speaking as a thing of the earth, it's preferable not to be trod upon atall.)

    Good linkage: George W. Queeg.

    I have to say again, it takes a certain amount of mad skill and determination to turn from a successful economy and a sudden shock that unites the entire world behind you to, within months, an economy spiralling into doom and the whole entire world against you.

    war - earliest mention of March 17

    The earliest I was able to find with a quick search was 06 March 2003: Troops 'told of March 17 invasion'

    Can anyone find earlier?

    I first blogged that date at 07:26 March 7 2003.

    war - Bush ultimatum

    Bush issues ultimatum on Iraq.

    President reports: "I already have March 17 blocked out for war, I don't know how to change it in Outlook".

    Here's a challenge: can someone find the first instance of March 17 being cited on the net as the war date? I'm sure I have been seeing it for weeks.

    security - practical crypto

    Ok, it's not exactly a free chapter, but it is the preface of the new book Practical Cryptography.

    On a somewhat related note: Wiley.com Now Offers E-Books.
    Wiley is a major book publisher. Don't think it will save you much (or any) money, but it may be a more convenient format for some than a huge stack of textbooks.



    You couldn't make this stuff up: Feds consider adding another terror risk level

    ... or could you ...

    Life imitates art

    I'd like one of these wise men who thought this stuff up to stand up and explain, exactly how you are supposed to behave differently when you're on yellow, orange, orange-red and red alert.

    I maintain my original theory of March 15, 2002.



    In case somehow you missed it the first few go 'rounds, here's a classic from way back in January 2001.




    Obsessive fans - is there anything they can't do?

    Farscape Fans Reinventing Television

    If for some reason you're not subscribed to Salon, I suppose there is a remote possibility that somehow, some way, the full text of the article might be available directly on Slashdot.



    I know just posting search hits is lame but honestly, with material like this, how can I pass it up

    16 Mar, Sun, 07:24:59     Google:  South Korean C1rcumc1s1on: Why the Heck do we do it